1.’ One would think that mathematical rigour is a valuable too (or even required) if one works in the empirical void. Answer this with Kevin Davey’s text.
1. Bring out mathematical oddities in quantum gravity: – 10 = 24/2 + 2 argument for relationship between bosonic and supersymmetric string theory
2. Discuss mathematical no-go theorems. – Dirac – Path integral What is interesting: once restricts inferential permissivity, the mathematical inconsistencies linked to these two notions stop to matter. (Indeed, even that one can model the delta function from a distribution theory point of view seems not to help here.) — Can we always localize which parts to ignore? (As in the delta distribution example the case — but not so clearly in the path integral example!) — Can we just take mathematical structures as bridge elements of discovery?
3. Are there cases where the mathematics is rigorous (or somewhat) — but the physics in question?
— The Thiemann trick; something well-defined as an operation then — but not clear it produces GR. (See: arxiv.org/pdf/2412.20272
[What about the Fleischhacker theorems? (Are they still mathematical? Or physical?)]
1. Bring out mathematical oddities in quantum gravity: – 10 = 24/2 + 2 argument for relationship between bosonic and supersymmetric string theory
2. Discuss mathematical no-go theorems. – Dirac – Path integral What is interesting: once restricts inferential permissivity, the mathematical inconsistencies linked to these two notions stop to matter. (Indeed, even that one can model the delta function from a distribution theory point of view seems not to help here.) — Can we always localize which parts to ignore? (As in the delta distribution example the case — but not so clearly in the path integral example!) — Can we just take mathematical structures as bridge elements of discovery?
3. Are there cases where the mathematics is rigorous (or somewhat) — but the physics in question?
— The Thiemann trick; something well-defined as an operation then — but not clear it produces GR. (See: arxiv.org/pdf/2412.20272
[What about the Fleischhacker theorems? (Are they still mathematical? Or physical?)]